Logic of will, discipline and communication: basis

home  •  logic  •  workbook  •  services  •  sources  

 

quest for logic •  logic of will •  logic and consultancy 

 

 

 

 

In my view both Postmodern thinkers and Modern thinkers are right, but in different systems.

 

 

 

 

 

The basis of the logic of will, discipline, and communication.

This theory is based on the epistemology of the “Logic of Feeling” by ARNOLD CORNELIS (1993). Adjustments and expansions come from:

·    the system theory as articulated by CHECKLAND, SENGE, VENNIX

·    autopoiesis and evolution of systems as articulated on the Principia Cyberneticaweb, and by DE ZEEUW, MATURANA & VARELA

·    memory making and sensemaking by WEICK

Description

The manner in which people order their worlds, what is found to be logical, how they develop their identities, are steered by their own drive towards development and the capacities attained in the process. I call this the natural system. It is assumed that every living system wants to grow, wants to expand itself. You learn who you are in your extended family or organisation in the natural system. The memory of the natural system is unconscious to a significant degree, but expresses itself in symbols, myths, stories, and rituals.

The development of identity is affected by the rules, norms, and structures of the society or organisation that you, along with other people, are part of. The rules, norms, and structures comprise the social system. In the social system, you learn to adapt yourself. The memory in the social system has been recorded in rules, procedures, organisational structures, ranks, and the like.

In this way, every organism, every organisation, develops its own “logic”: a set of images of reality, models for what is logical. These models are stored in the memory.

The development of capacities and performance capability reach their limits at a certain point. Changes in the environment can require new activities, which cannot be conceived of at that time for the organisation because they are not logical, and do not fit in the models of reality. The more the environment changes, the greater the need for new actions. This requires the performance repertoire to be expanded. However, to enable this, we must revise the rules, norms, and social structures from the social system, tested against the personal development and values of the natural system. This test can only be conducted in communication with others, bringing the existing models of reality up to the conscious level and discussing them. Only then can new models of reality arise. When the transition is made to testing the drive for growth in the natural system against sthe drive for justice in the social system, then a new layer arises, the system of communicative self-steering. Here, the memory consists of the intentions of a person or organisation: What do you want to learn? What direction has an organisation chosen for development?

Thus, the development of capacities has dual-steering from two systems, which can be integrated by a third system. So every identity can develop three layers: natural system, social system, and system of communicative self-steering.

A crucial point in this model is that one layer is not any more important than another. For complete and thorough development, you cannot miss any of the three layers. One system builds on another.

continu: model for organisational development

Top of page